• sir_pronoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have not dared to test my games with proton on Linux, but if they all work, Windows will be nothing but a VM for me that I use for the exceptions when something doesn’t run under wine. Sheesh.

      • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I haven’t tried linux for like 8 years now and my oly problem was that the games i played back then weren’t supported by linux. I kinda want them to force me to dip into linux again. Last week or so i had to solve a fucking riddle to start my computer to not accidentally accept anything. I hate it so much.

    • iflyspaceships@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I made the switch on my daily driver laptop about 4 months ago. I mainly play games like Factorio, Dwarf Fortress and Rimworld, and they all work fine. Only trouble Ive had is with older games like Red Alert. Check out ProtonDB

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Read the article? :D Doesn’t look like it’s live they just caught it in code

        • Destide@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s not how code of this magnitude works off the cuff GetPhysicallyInstalledSystemMemory() and GetPhysicalDiskSize()) aren’t defined and might exist in a file they couldn’t access. It’s also in C++ so you’d have to compile it first no one’s going through all that for a visual screenshot of a watermark at this stage

        • xan1242@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          They kinda don’t have the sources there. That’s a decompilation by IDA in that image.

          But nevertheless they could run it if they set up an arm64 machine, technically.

        • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you want a serious answer, you could theoretically disable all security checks on Win11 so you could hex-edit patch it to run, but it would be (1) a lot of effort and (2) probably show that it’s nowhere near finished, because it still misses UI integration for example

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good, to be honest. Like it or not, Microsoft is going all-in on AI stuff, and when Windows starts crashing randomly because the tech kid in your family decided to override the minimum requirements to upgrade to Windows 11, you probably want to know beforehand.

    The requirements as documented in the article are “popcnt” and SSE 4.2 support which have been default in just about any amd64 CPU capable of running Windows 11 for at least a decade. The Snapdragon check is probably there so people using unlicensed copies of Windows 11 on their Macs aren’t surprised when the AI stuff starts crashing programs.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    hardware requirements aren’t that huge … a cpu that supports 11 and 16GB RAM minimum. CPU has to support SSE4.2, which every 11 compatible cpu has. Honestly, this should be your minimum requirements nowadays. Anythjng that can’t do the job is literally 8+ years old.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      every laptop that’s on sale right now under $600 has less than 16gb of RAM

      it’s not compatible with windows 11, but today apple is still selling $1500 laptops with 8gb of RAM

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      PC vendors are still selling laptops with 4GB RAM. 16GB should absolutely be the minimum (and should have been since 2020), but it’s very much not true that anything with less than 16GB is over 8 years old.

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Anythjng that can’t do the job is literally 8+ years old.

      So what? How about Microsoft lets me define what ‘the job’ is and I will decide for myself whether my machine is up to it? In my opinion the job of an operating system is to expose computing resources to whatever the user wants to do and then get the fuck out of the way.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The minimum requirements are there for them to set a lower limit on what they’re willing to support. You do whatever you want, just don’t complain when something doesn’t work, or breaks because you’re bypassing those limits.

        People do this all the time and then complain and blame Microsoft for issues when they are using an configuration they were told was unsupported and might have issues.

        • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The minimum requirements are there for them to set a lower limit on what they’re willing to support.

          I agree and they’re free to do whatever they want. I get to have an opinion on their actions though.

          What I take issue with is they are enforcing minimum specs because they’re choosing to put a bunch of stuff in the operating system that won’t run (well) below those specs. In other words they are choosing the job that the operating system has to do (GenAI in this case) and I think that is up to the user, not the OS vendor.

          If the GenAI stuff they want to build in were optional then you could choose to purchase a cheaper computer or upgrade your existing hardware to a current OS. By going this route Microsoft is artificially inflating hardware requirements.

    • Undaunted@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      My PC has a i7-4790k overclocked to 4.5 GHz. It runs smoothly since I got it when it came out and it is still not a bottleneck in any of the games I play. But if I wanted to upgrade to Windows 11 I would need to buy a new CPU, new main board and new RAM, and it would not improve my gaming experience at all. It was my last machine running windows which I changed to Linux 2 months ago and I haven’t looked back.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That CPU would probably meet these requirements abd wouldn’t be affected. The normal Windows 11 requirements are a separate thing which are more demanding but can be bypassed. Though Linux is probably better anyway, especially for older machines. Itt’s requirements haven’t really changed in the last 10 years.

    • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I have a computer I use mostly in my office, but sometimes I run games on it, because why not, that has a Xeon x3460. It can run literally every game I’ve thrown at it at 60fps, and it can do literally any workload I need it to do. It’s 15 years old. This isn’t the 80s or 90s where technology is changing so fast that you have to upgrade every year or two to keep up. There’s very little reason to upgrade if you have a working computer.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That CPU came out in 2009. I think things have changed since then. The Intel stagnation issue ended with Ryzen.

        Not saying you should throw away your machine, but expecting it to support all features of an OS made 15 years later is unreasonable. They also aren’t saying it won’t work, just that you don’t get all features. It already is way past what Windows 11 was designed to run on (which imo was unreasonable at the time).

        If you want to use 15 year old hardware then use Linux. I do anyway for other reasons, and it keeps my FX-6300 server running fine too.