• explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which description? That Wikipedia article says “The aim is to provide an alternative to centralized platforms such as YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion.”

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference to YouTube is that it’s not intended to create a huge platform centralizing videos from the whole world on a single server farm (which is horribly expensive).

          From their website. It’s a very different system, and also not funded by advertisers, which means someone else has to pay the bills.