• explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which description? That Wikipedia article says “The aim is to provide an alternative to centralized platforms such as YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion.”

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference to YouTube is that it’s not intended to create a huge platform centralizing videos from the whole world on a single server farm (which is horribly expensive).

        From their website. It’s a very different system, and also not funded by advertisers, which means someone else has to pay the bills.