the mitigations just have bugs, and bugs can be fixed

I’m not convinced it won’t be a thing of the past after some time

It means that if quantum technology improves, the same technique can break higher bit integers. So it’s in fact broken, we just don’t have the future hardware to execute it on yet.

The issue is they can install spyware after selling their company and if you have automatic updates you’ll get that too

Because they wasted 5 people’s time on it instead of pulling in the first pr

You already have to fork the chromium project to make Brave and degoogled chromium

You can support V3 without limiting the number of filters! The limit is arbitrarily chosen to block fewer ads

Is it, though? A lot of self-taught programmers do great work. I’m not sure this is true

No, because it either runs the program successfully, or it fails to launch. I don’t mess with the protocol. It runs as root because it needs to set the iptables when turned on to be a “global” proxy

Yes, but people with master’s degrees also fuck this up, so it’s not like some accreditation system will solve the issue of people making mistakes

I have to actually modify the code to properly package it for my distro, so it’s engineering because I have to make decisions for how things work

ChatGPT: I’m happy for you though, Or sorry that happened

Look, nothing will blow up if I mess up my proxy setup on my machine. I just won’t have internet until I revert my change. Why would that be different if I were getting paid for it?

It’s not so hard, you just run it in your own VPS, open the ports and go

I use a proxy and route all of the packets except DNS through it using iptables

Just use your own proxy, you can use that for everything

That’s the whole company. How much did YouTube lose for them?

It’s blocked for people who don’t use a VPN

Generative AI isn’t that funny, so I see that Silverman has a strong case, that being her purview

Anyone else’s page not loading?

You have the cause and effect switched. More intelligent parents have higher incomes, their kids also are more likely to have higher intelligence because it’s heritable. So if a bunch of rich Jews live in a Manhattan, does it mean that IQ is predicting their zip code? Or is it predicting they are Jewish? That’s just a weird way of thinking about it.

Your definition of intelligence is not that is commonly thought of intelligence. It’s like saying “intelligence is your maximum chess skill measured by elo and you will never achieve it”

But learning to play chess quickly would also fall under intelligence. Given not being a high level at a similar game, there will be people who learn quicker than others. Learning languages, learning from your experience, all fall under intelligence.

If you take all of these measures, average them, you will get a true intelligence measurement. IQ is a sample of true intelligence by using only some measurements, since intelligence can have an infinite amount of tasks that it can be used to perform

I never said it’s the cause. We’re trying to find a measure that correlates well with actual intelligence g

IQ correlates with g, but also income/education correlates with g because smarter people do better in these metrics.

IQ doesn’t make you smarter, but smarter people can do better on IQ tests