For what it’s worth, I would say those sources mostly lean center right.
It was a massacre.
I suppose those police officers just set themselves on fire then?
authoritarian regimes
As opposed to those non-authoritarian regimes that you, as a self proclaimed anarchist, definitely believe in.
One look at your activity here shows that that’s a lie.
“There’s no point arguing with you; you’ll disagree with me!”
It’s probably not logistically viable, but as a matter of principle, there is absolutely no reason why DPRK couldn’t host to world cup. It’s gone to plenty of worse countries.
The Canadian government has proved you solidly wrong
Foreign powers unilaterally divided the country in half, and the actual country itself just has to accept it?
Your patience is so limited you can’t bare to even see contrary opinions to your own?
Their argument was that so called Western socialists are mostly just Western chauvinists who make their determination on what movements are “real socialists” based on how closely they align, racially and culturally, to the West.
There, that’s their argument.
Ok, but what’s the new strategy?
Liberals when someone denies white genocide: 😡
Liberals when someone denies the Holocaust: 😍
Really going mask off there.
Doing holocaust denial to own the tankies!
How does any of that disagree with what he said?
As ever, actual Jewish Holocaust scholars agree with us https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory
Not by “assigning a slightly different definition”, just by applying the definition consistently, rather than using the standard.
Least bad faith liberal