Any evidence of that? Genuinely curious as I can’t really find anything about them being by the same people and forgefed started as mailed-based prior to forgejo existing.
edit: seems like they are funded by different organizations and the main contributors to forgefed never worked on forgejo, they worked on vervis though.
Just to give credit where credit is due, git federation is a Forgefed Initiative
Forgejo is implementing it in their platform.
One of the first interaction I witnessed from the forgejo guys was this PR:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27455/
The interaction and stubbornness of earl-warren felt like it was just that, provoked drama.
I use owncloud infinite scale and overall its rock solid. The downside is the lack of plugins. Nextcloud has been nothing but trouble for me and every update was a mess so I decided to try OCIS and for my need I was extremely satisfied.
Now, I admit, I’m not one to get carried by the drama in the FOSS sphere (still use Gitea) but I do agree there is an history to the separation of owncloud and nextcloud that can make some people uncomfortable. Having a choice is good I believe.
There you go:
# Start an infinite loop because True will always be True
while True:
# try to run the main function, usually where everything happens
try:
main()
# in the case an exception is raised in the main function simply discard (pass) and restart the loop
except:
pass
For those curious about the drama & lack of wide adoption surrounding the walrus operator
https://dev.to/renegadecoder94/the-controversy-behind-the-walrus-operator-in-python-4k4e
It’s a shame because it’s a really nice feature.
I started using hatch lately and really like how I can manage everything from the pyproject.toml file
My secret to high uptime:
while True:
try:
main()
except:
pass
deleted by creator
Edit: something that are not arm based
You want pre-built to run ollama, that’s at least gonna cost you an arm, maybe even a leg.
Forgejo contains all of Gitea, and that has the benefit of allowing Forgejo to be a drop-in replacement. With the decision to become a hard fork, this will no longer be guaranteed
I’m glad to see them move their own direction but I’m skeptical considering the amount of commits they take directly from Gitea. I could see this becoming more like a Fedora/Rhel type of fork but we’ll see.
I’m personally staying with Gitea for now as I have yet to find a reason to switch.
I’ve been using hatch lately and being able to setup dependencies, packaging, ruff, and black all in a package.toml and not having to setup virtual environment is really nice. I’d recommend a try.
I’ll say that as someone who stopped using docker and went back to deploying from source in lxc containers: dockers is a great tool for the majority of people and that is exactly what it aims to be, easily reusable in as many different setups as possible.
On the flip side, yes it may happen that you would not benefit from docker for a reason or another. I don’t, in my case docker only adds another layer over my already containerized setup and many of the services I deploy are already built from source in a CI/CD workflow and deployed through ansible.
I do have other issues with docker but those are usually less with the tool and more with how some project use docker as a mean to replace proper deployment documentations.
The majority of maintainers stayed with Gitea. Forgejo is not the tip, they still pull the majority of their commit from gitea directly.
The only winner here is his sister who’s name was not as publicized. Exa Dark Siderael
The accompanying existential crisis
Mi-scel-la-ne-ous
As a non-native, fuck that word
I hate you, congrats!
In Canada we have to give our firstborn to a telecommunication monopoly for somewhat OK internet.
I just want to say how much I appreciate those discussion. They remind me of how little I know even though I’m considered an “expert” in my field of work.
Linus? 'That you?