This! Haven’t used that one personally, but seeing how good ruff is I bet it’s darn amazing, next best thing that I used has been PDM and Poetry, because Python’s first party tooling has always been lackluster, no cohesive way to define a project and actually work it until relatively recently

Could be, it looks pretty unknown for now though

That does make sense! I like the point about older systems, I didn’t even stop to think about how much storge space has exploded in such a short amount of time and how it started from incredibly small capacities at very high prices that could have been hard to justify for any company that realistically just needed to keep some records

That’s really interesting!

The good news is it sounds like this issue is being taken into account.

Is there a part in that page that says so? I wasn’t able to find it

I wouldn’t be surprised if they added a YEAR2 though. T-SQL has a datetime2, after all.

Ok I wasn’t expecting that, it sounds like a meme, but it’s actually real lol

Yes 2 bytes is absolutely fine for me in fact (waiting for this comment to age like milk in my cryo pod), but then if YEAR will just stay the same forever, will it become a relic of the past? If so, why YEAR in the first place, who would actually make use of it?

Am too surprised that it is an evolving standard, so I was curious to read a little, then…

Purchase for non-member: $676.00

What???

And better error messages than “bro, you got a syntax error on this line”

That illustration is a mood

Wow, awesome explanation! I think I understand now

Yes, that’s really nice! Even though I haven’t touched it in a long time, I remember messing around with it out as soon as it came out a few years ago. There’s also nest.land between the alternative repositories, I find their concept interesting

That’s fair honestly, also I dig that it’s made in Solid!

Damn, sounds like a big headache x.x

You mean npm duplicates even if the the two dependency versions are compatible?

you can only have one version of the same package on your system.

That couldn’t be, right? Otherwise, if you installed two packages that rely on different incompatible versions of another package, one of the two would break. Reading a bit they should check for “satisfiability”, I found some really interesting things on the topic looking around:

• pattern to install dependencies in Linux
• history of libsolv (used in e.g. DNF) (kinda flies over my head, but that’s where the term " satisfiability" came up)

Based rustacean

The standard library thing is a really valid point, but how do you avoid recursive dependencies? Do you just not allow library packages to depend on anything?

pip is saner

Is it? It is very bare bones in my experience, I could never bring myself to use it until they make it a more fully fledged tool, such as the cargo you mentioned, yes

This is hilarious, but now I’m wondering, what would a saner package manger look like?

I didn’t want to say that because it sounds mean, but yes, pretty much

Anyone can, but not everyone needs to

Thanks for not leaving out the lucky 10 000 <3