The fact you accept that 98% statistic with total credulity is telling. The Ceaușescu government in Romania also claimed similar levels of support. So does Putin. What’s the one thing they have in common?
wiki-user: unruffled
- When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called “the People’s Stick.”
- If you took the most ardent revolutionary, vested him in absolute power, within a year he would be worse than the Tsar himself.
- Mikhail Bakunin
The fact you accept that 98% statistic with total credulity is telling. The Ceaușescu government in Romania also claimed similar levels of support. So does Putin. What’s the one thing they have in common?
Because “you don’t get rich by paying your bills” according to them.
So long as they can pocket a few hundred milion from the IPO, Reddit management couldn’t give a monkey’s about any of their milions of users or the thousands of communities that made Reddit valuable in the first place. They are quite happily flushing all that down the toilet to get their big pay day. Why didn’t they just go non-profit like Wikipedia? That’s the only business model that makes sense for Reddit and is sustainable. But then nobody gets to become a multi millionaire, and we can all see which would be the bigger tragedy for u/spez.
So he reckons that without locking out free downstream users, Red Hat would go tits up and the whole Linux ecosystem would fall into the hands of hackers and hobbyists? Fine by me.
I like Jeff Geerling’s response:
Red Hat: those who use open source code and don’t contribute back are “a real threat to open source companies everywhere”
I call them: users.
I fight for the users.
Fashjacketing anyone who criticises China’s government says more about you than me.