• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I think it should be younger. Maybe 65.

    Members of Congress and SCOTUS should also have term limits

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m onboard with 65 as the maximum age anyone can run for Congress but I don’t have a problem with people 65+ finishing their terms provided they’re actually competent. I’d like to see mandatory cognitive decline testing for anyone running for Congress, appointed to the SC or appointed to any high position in the executive branch.

      It’s absolutely ridiculous that we’re allowing people with 5-7y remaining life expectancy to plan our future 20, 40 or 100y our - they just don’t have the skin in the game that someone in their 20s of 30s does.

      On top of all of that I’d like to see vigorous corruption testing, SC justices and congresscreatures shouldn’t be bought and paid for the way they are now.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah that sounds reasonable. You can at most finish your current term once you’re past 65. And term-limit everything, Justices, whatever.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      “After many decades of civil service, it is time for the state to give back to our hard working representatives. Therefore they will be retired in januray of the year following their 65th birthday”

      “January 6th has for the last few years been a reminder of an embarrassing moment in our history, well no longer! January 6th shall henceforth be known as a day of celebration, celebrating not only long and faithfull service but also new talents, skills and hope for the furue! Join us, as we once again rejuvinate our government to keep our nation strong and dependable!”