A few days ago I shared some news that the Eurovision song from Israel would be named “Your land is mine now” to later realize it was from an onion kind of website, lol.

I hope I’m not alone in this kind of f’up.

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    1·
    9 months ago

    Antisemitism is about hating jews because they’re jews. That’s completely separate from criticizing a nation for crimes against humanity. The first is a group of people with no central government, the second is an administrative entity with a military that is violating the Geneva convention in another country.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        0·
        9 months ago

        You literally have no reading comprehension. You pressed me three times, and each time I responded with ‘Any country that deals with a population it considers problematic by completely restricting access to food, medicine, and potable water is committing a genocide’

        Each time you ignored that and tried to ‘press’ me again.

        It’s almost like you’re looking for an answer you’re not getting.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            0·
            9 months ago

            Not if the government in question is completely restricting access to food medicine and potable water to a population it considers problematic.

            But, you certainly won’t either. You certainly don’t now that the ICJ has found Israel is plausibly committing genocide.

            Plausible is what the recent case was about, if you actually read.

            It was too determine if South Africa has standing, and if it was plausible that Israel was committing genocide for a full trial. As a result of its finding, it called on Israel to stop killing Palestinian civilians and to preserve evidence for the eventual trial.

            Asking me if I will agree with their finding is pointless, as it will be years before the trial is finished.

            So, now that you know that the ICJ has found it plausible, will you stop accusing people who claim Israel is committing genocide are antisemitic, or are you willing to admit that claim came solely from nationalism in bad faith?

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                0·
                9 months ago

                Do your own research. That was literally the point of the court hearing.

                It’s why they ordered Israel to preserve evidence.

                Seriously, watch all three presentations. It’s worth doing. Unless you don’t want your obvious world view destroyed.

                If you don’t want to be `bullied’ (although, I can’t for the life of me understand why you’d use that word for people defending themselves from your accusations of antisemitism due to them pointing out a genocide), then don’t attack people with the bad faith accusation of antisemitism.

                You still haven’t answered the question.

                Come on, I answered yours. It’s your turn.

                What would it take for you to admit that recognizing a genocide isn’t antisemitism?

                  • Count042@lemmy.ml
                    0·
                    9 months ago

                    I think you are refusing to do any research on something you aren’t willing to change your mind about. I think nothing would change your mind, so you didn’t even bother watching any of the three parts of the hearing because you already knew what you would believe.

                    Your method of doing that is to never state a clear opinion, not engage in any logic, and respond to everything with questions.

                    I’ll follow suit. What do you think the purpose of that hearing was, and what do you think the conclusion was for the hearing?

                    But, as per my previous paragraph, I’d bet you didn’t even watch it.