How many wiretaps do you have in your home?

  • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People in the 80’s: Some day an AI will take over the world.
    People today: YO CHAT GPT, Write a song about hamsters robbing a bank!

    • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      (Verse 1) In the underground, where the tunnels run deep, There’s a crew of hamsters, they don’t get no sleep. With their tiny masks and their paws so sly, They’re plottin’ a heist, gonna reach for the sky.

      (Chorus) Hamster heist, in the dead of the night, They’re rollin’ on wheels, gonna steal out of sight. Little furball bandits, ain’t no one suspect, In this phonk song, their caper’s perfect.

      (Verse 2) They scoped out the bank, made a plan so cool, Hamster in the getaway car, he’s the wheelman, no fool. The vault’s their target, full of sunflower seeds, These rodents mean business, fulfillin’ their needs.

      (Chorus) Hamster heist, in the dead of the night, They’re rollin’ on wheels, gonna steal out of sight. Little furball bandits, ain’t no one suspect, In this phonk song, their caper’s perfect.

      (Bridge) They scurry and scamper, through vents they’ll explore, In the dark of the bank, they’re gonna score. With their pockets full of loot, they’ll make their escape, These hamster outlaws, there’s no time to wait.

      (Verse 3) But the bank’s alarm starts to ring out so loud, And the security guards, they’re joinin’ the crowd. The hamsters keep movin’, they won’t back down, They’ve come too far now, they’ll own this town.

      (Chorus) Hamster heist, in the dead of the night, They’re rollin’ on wheels, gonna steal out of sight. Little furball bandits, ain’t no one suspect, In this phonk song, their caper’s perfect.

      (Outro) In the end, they made it away with the dough, Through tunnels and alleys, they continue to go. Those hamster bandits, the legends they’ll be, In the annals of rodent crime history.

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        For some reason I read it with that agressive shouting gangster rap voice and it was awsome. Tho chat gpt mostly pumps out mid content. Just reminds you how important is the creative factor that often lack in these generative contents.

            • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It also rhymes words that have similar alphabetical structure, but poor phonetic similarity.

              Like suspect and perfect.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              When ChatGPT was newer I saw a lot of posts about raps made by it, there were always this same flow. I tried to get it to make decent rhymes, but it cannot get out of the most cheesy typical rhyme scheme possible. This was 3.5, maybe 4 or other models are better. I found I could make interesting lines if I said something like “write a paragraph with as many words that rhyme with ‘taken’ as possible”, and then you could do that with a few rhymes and twist those around to make an interesting verse.

              • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you give it a different form to follow (iambic pentameter, sonnet, etc.) it kind of works. I’ve only tested it with poetry. I’ve gotten responses technically comparable to a human, but even eliminating the “nonsense” words it throws in, it still has no artistic soul… The closest I’ve gotten to art was specifying “in the style of Edgar Allan Poe”, but it was only good because it copied a few of his poems verbatim…

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s true about ‘in the style of’, I did get some interesting responses when I said in the style of Allen Ginsberg, but it would just rip lines straight from him at times. As someone who enjoys creative writing I don’t see a necessarily beneficial use for AI to be extremely capable at creating poetry haha but I am interested in the mechanics of it and how it could be improved.

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    edit: added snowden videos.


    We carry devices that have multiple mics/GPS/video with the possibility of recording us at any time.

    Our phones are the main way I think we are tracked.


    Edward Snowden: “You Don’t Realise THESE APPS Are SPYING On You!” [April 28, 2021]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jxdwIkFdj8

    “I Remove This Mysterious Tiny Chip Before Using The Phone!” Edward Snowden [BrainStation, March 11, 2021]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dGqR4ue8dg

    ‘State of Surveillance’ with Edward Snowden and Shane Smith (VICE on HBO: Season 4, Episode 13) [June 8, 2016]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucRWyGKBVzo

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    this gonna be an unpopular take, but your mobile phone is worse for privacy than an Alexa or Google Home. And most people’s PCs are worse than their phones.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say Alexa is actually much worse because there’s already been instances where Amazon gave the info up to law enforcement. PCs and phone manufacturers might’ve also but I think it would be less than a dedicated microphone in your house.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        for my original point, I’d say that an Alexa is a single point of access for giving your info to law enforcement, whereas a phone has multiple (ie each app and website) and pcs have more software and less stringent access policies (ie less likely to have facial recognition or fingerprint recognition as the barrier to access) and you can just open the case and take out the hard drive much easier.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both Alexa and phones have to be listening to everything to be able to answer when you call them. Considering that data is sent over to Google/Amazon, it isn’t much different.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But phones have a dedicated microphone and location tracking service built in. If there is a software vulnerability (there is always a software vulnerability) then it can be remotely turned on and monitored.

        There are even instances of this happening to targets of governments: journalists and activists, especially. That Israeli company specializes in it and sells access to anyone who is willing to pay.

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, thanks to Edward Snowden, we’ve know NSA has been able to turn these on without us knowing (without the red light) for a long time now.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Idk why you’re downvoting the guy WetBeardHairs is right. Pegasus spyware has been a serious threat and was created by a nation state hacking group in Israel called NSO group.

          This is why I do the best I can and use GrapheneOS, but there could always be some security vulnerability deep in Android itself. If you’re looking for true privacy and security, a burner or something with removable components would be best.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sticking with “the average pc” and “the average phone” — I’d say there are more vectors of vulnerability in the wide arrange of sites and programs the average person interacts with on their PC than there is on a phone, as well as a PC being a better target to compromise than someone’s phone.

        Happy to be proved wrong but I rarely hear about someone’s phone being randomwared, botnetted, remote accessed etc

        • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, true.

          I was thinking about it more as phones have multiple cameras and microphones, are constantly with us, and are usually full of spyware apps.

        • Noughmad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          More vulnerable, probably yes. Phones are very locked down and secured (unless you root or install custom firmware).

          But, they are still worse for privacy due to how they’re used. The phone (and thus Google and Apple and Facebook and others) has access to your location all the time - your computer doesn’t. The computer is only vulnerable when on - the phone is always on.

          The threats are different and from different sources. Random hackers mining shitcoins on your computer, big companies knowing what you’re doing when you carry your phone.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well it depends whether active usage is a vector in how secure a device is. If security is exposure to risk / frequency of use, you are correct, same with exposure to risk / percent of global ownership (66% smart phone, 50% personal computer), but if we’re talking about any given device with an even chance it’s a pc or smartphone, I’m willing to bet (although I don’t have proof) that any given smartphone is slightly more secure.

  • Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Talking to my phone is just awkward, the exception is watching something on YouTube, then pausing and going “Siri, how much is 69 fahrenheit in celsius?” to an iPad behind me.