And what can we do to make the Internet a more safe and privacy friendly place and replace the ad business by something less unpleasant ?

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 months ago

    We care about your privacy which is why we are sharing your date with almost 1000 services 998 of which are fully redundant and only 1 is actually needed for the service we provide

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think I saw 1500 this week somewhere…

    All I want to know is, how can it be profitable to be an ad broker at that point?

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I had high 700s, where even 1 is more than I can stomach. Thank devs for uBlock Origin.

  • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    And what can we do to make the Internet a more safe and privacy friendly place and replace the ad business by something less unpleasant ?

    back-to-me-shining JB-shining-aggro stalin-shining mao-aggro-shining

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure. I’m a fanatical ad-blocker myself, but sometimes using Tor browser with the defaults.

  • egonallanon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    1200ish is my personal best can’t remember what site it was on.

    As to what we can do not really a clue on a grand scale,i just block ads and cookies fanatically.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Whenever I see a cookie banner say something like “We respect your privacy” I chuckle.

    Because if they would actually respect my privacy, they wouldn’t have had a banner in the first place.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think I recently saw ~840 somewhere.

    To replace the current big tech business, I have a few suggestions:

    1. Use FOSS (Free and open source software)
    2. If this is not possible, try to find software that does not invade your privacy and made by a smaller company
    3. Try to avoid paying privacy invading companies. I’m not saying never pay for proprietary software, but try to only spend the money on ones that respect you.
    4. Spread the word about good FOSS apps
    5. Donate to FOSS
    6. Vote for politicians who are serious about antitrust
    7. If you have the skills, contribute to FOSS or make your own software!
    8. Use adblockers on websites that don’t respect you and/or your privacy
  • Sabata11792@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I ususally have them blocked, but on some news site I remember seeing 750+ and off it wanted you to manually unchecked all of them one by one.

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    And what can we do to make the Internet a more safe and privacy friendly place and replace the ad business by something less unpleasant ?

    Start paying for stuff. Subscriptions, etc.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Great, so now we get to pay for the privilege of having our data harvested by 814 “partners”

      Remember: “if you aren’t paying for the product then you are the product” is no longer accurate, you’re the product regardless of paying or not now.

      • frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why just make money from subscription fees when you can make EVEN MORE money by serving adds as well?

        I’m just happy that I got to see the glory days of the digital world before advertising moved in.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup. Just how cable TV started as “you pay extra for it, but you don’t get any ads!” and then when they realized they had everybody hooked, they started showing ads.

        Same thing with streaming services. Pay money for a service with no Ads. Oh what’s that? Now that they realize they are your primary source of content, they are going to turn ads on unless you pay extra? Boom, gottem.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Paying for a service is generally going to result in less of a push to monetize the data though, especially if it’s a smaller provider or a private company.

        We can’t just give up and stick with ad supported services, but then not want to see ads… Ad-supported services are always going to have to try monetize you somehow, whereas paid services don’t always need to.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m pretty sure I’ve seen four digits. That was a “lol no”.

    And what can we do to make the Internet a more safe and privacy friendly place and replace the ad business by something less unpleasant ?

    Websites have to pay their bills. Ads, subscriptions or microtransactions; take your pick.

    The one way I can think of that would retain the anonymous character of the internet would be HTTP microtransactions by some kind of crypto. Hopefully one of the non-wasteful ones, so not Bitcoin.

    • emb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think what you’re describing at the end there is basically what Brave (browser) tried to do.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Huh, I missed that. Yep, they were using Bitcoin back before it was fully a circlejerk, looks like, which is reasonable. Now I just know it as a Chrome spinoff that pretends to be private, haha.

        It looks like Chrome’s trying to do something similar, although there’s a high chance Google will attempt a walled garden version.

        “Web Monetization” is the keyword. It could be great for things like Lemmy, too, where hosting costs might eventually become a major obstacle.